Anti-corrosion anti-reflection glass and related methods

ABSTRACT

Certain example embodiments relate to methods of making anti-corrosion anti-reflection (ACAR) films, and/or associated coated articles. The methods may involve forming the reaction product of a hydrolysis and/or a condensation reaction of at least one hybrid alkoxide selected from the group consisting of Si(OR) 4 —Al(s-OBu) 3 , Si(OR) 4 —B(OBu) 3  and Si(OR) 4  and Zr(OBu) 4 , where R is a CH 2 CH 3  group, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide. The solution optionally may be blended and/or mixed with silicon nanoparticles and/or siloxanes. A Tqe % gain of about 3.2% and/or refractive index of 1.5 or less is/are possible in certain example embodiments.

Certain example embodiments of this invention relate to substrates supporting anti-corrosion anti-reflection (ACAR) coatings, and/or methods of making the same. In certain example embodiments of this invention, such coatings may be used in photovoltaic devices, antifog mirrors, anti-glare applications, anti-UV applications, anti-smudge applications, anti-static applications, self-cleaning applications, electrochromic glass, storefront windows, display cases, picture frames, greenhouses, other types of windows, and/or in any other suitable application.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Anti-reflection (AR) coatings are known in the art. SFO (solar float) and MM (matte-matte) glass, for example, have been coated using sol-gel processes to provide anti-reflective optics. However, SFO and MM glass developed using known sol-gel processes could be improved by providing better resistance to salt fogs and/or other forms of moisture that could corrode the coatings and cause them to degrade in anti-reflective performance and/or create undesirable visible appearances.

A salt fog test chamber may include steam vapor of NaOH and NaCl with a chamber temperature of 35° C. and pressure of 16 psi. Inability to sufficiently resist corrosion in salt fog environments simulated using a salt fog test chamber such as this may limit the application of anti-reflection (AR) glass used in some environments such as, for example, environments near oceans, with high mineral moisture, etc. For instance, a thin AR film can be easily removed after a salt fog test, e.g., after being structurally attacked in a manner that damages the adhesive strength between thin film and glass or other substrate that supports the coating.

It also is believed that alkali ions are preferentially leached from multiple components silica glasses with alkali oxides. The failure mechanism noted above thus could be attributed to the unsymmetrical glass, e.g., resulting from the attacks of sodium ions (Na⁺) migrating from the glass bulk to the surface of the AR thin film. Some Na⁺ ions in a salt fog solution could also provide a source to attack the AR thin film.

During salt fog testing processes, Na⁺ ions from the glass substrate may diffuse into the AR coating layer, and consequently the properties of AR thin film may be changed. In some instances, there may be a layer of reduced sodium concentration and increased hydrogen amount near the glass-solution interface. When alkali ions are leached from the glass, it may provide a space that can allow water molecules to penetrate into the coating.

A hydrated layer could then be generated, especially in less durable glass. A more open structure in the hydrated layer of or on the glass surface may result in a faster transfer of ions from the glass, and a swell structure may also be found on a hydrated layer. Furthermore, hydroxyl groups produced by ion exchange between Na⁺ and H₂O may boost the hydrolysis of the siloxane bond and result in fatigue-type damage to the AR thin film.

Thus, it will be appreciated that there may be instances where it would be desirable to improve the chemical stability of AR thin films in potentially corrosive environments, e.g., as simulated by a salt fog chamber.

It is believed that, prior to the present disclosure, there was no reason to expect that the inclusion of hybrid alkoxides in an AR coating would lead to good durability for that coating. In fact, those skilled in the art might expect that AR coatings that include hybrid alkoxides would not be very strong and thus would not provide good durability.

This expectation stems from the belief that one might expect potential failure locations to be present at discontinuities in the coating, and the inclusion of hybrid alkoxides logically would involve a higher than usual number of potential failure locations, e.g., because of the structure of the alkoxides themselves as exacerbated by the hybrid materials included in the coating.

Yet despite these preexisting expectations, the present application relates to the inclusion of hybrid alkoxides in the AR coating of certain example embodiments, which surprisingly and unexpectedly leads to improved durability of the coating. More particularly, it is believed that the specific bonding energies of the materials may promote a sort of “self-healing” coating in ways that would not have been expected and that are surprising and unexpected.

In certain example embodiments, there is provided a method of making a coated article comprising an anti-reflection coating supported by a glass substrate. The method includes depositing on the glass substrate at least a portion of a solution comprising at least one hybrid alkoxide selected from the group consisting of Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide, respectively, optionally with a silicon nanoparticle and a siloxane, to form a substantially uniform coating. The solution is cured and/or allowed to cure, in making the anti-reflection coating.

In certain example embodiments, there is provided a coated article comprising an anti-reflection coating supported by a glass substrate. The anti-reflection coating comprises a reaction product of a hydrolysis and/or a condensation reaction of at least one hybrid alkoxide selected from the group consisting of Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide. The anti-reflection coating has a refractive index less than 1.5.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features and advantages may be better and more completely understood by reference to the following detailed description of exemplary illustrative embodiments in conjunction with the drawings, of which:

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates hydrolysis of B(OBu)₃.

FIG. 2 schematically illustrates hydrolysis of Al(s-OBu)₃.

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates hydrolysis of Zr(OBu)₄.

FIG. 4 schematically illustrates a hydrolysis of TEOS with acid as a catalyst.

FIG. 5 schematically illustrates condensation of hydrolyzed B(OBu)₃.

FIG. 6 schematically illustrates condensation of hydrolyzed Al(s-OBu)₃.

FIG. 7 schematically illustrates condensation of hydrolyzed Zr(OBu)₄.

FIG. 8 schematically illustrates a condensation of hydrolyzed Si(OR)₄ with acid as a catalyst.

FIG. 9 schematically illustrates hydrolysis of glass with an unsymmetrical network.

FIG. 10 schematically illustrates a durable structure of ACAR glass made by hybrid alkoxides with Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃.

FIG. 11 schematically illustrates a chemical structure from hybrid alkoxides.

FIG. 12 schematically illustrates a GC-MS spectrum of Gen 1.5 sol.

FIG. 13 schematically illustrates a GC-MS spectrum of sol with Al(s-OBu)₃.

FIG. 14 schematically illustrates a GC-MS spectrum of sol from hybrid alkoxides with Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃.

FIG. 15 schematically illustrates transmittance curves of ACAR glass made by a blended sol with different hybrid alkoxides, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 8.

FIG. 16 schematically illustrates reflection curves of ACAR glass, with the labels being those provided in Table 9.

FIG. 17 schematically illustrates transmittance curves of ACAR glass made by mixed sols, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 10.

FIG. 18 schematically illustrates transmittance curves of ACAR glass made by Al—Si hybrid alkoxides, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 13.

FIG. 19 schematically illustrates transmittance curves of ACAR glass made by B—Si hybrid alkoxides, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 13.

FIG. 20 schematically illustrates transmittance curves of ACAR glass made by Zr—Si hybrid alkoxides, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 13.

FIG. 21 schematically illustrates the thickness and refractive index of ACAR glass made by a sol with silica and aluminum alkoxides, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 17.

FIG. 22 schematically illustrates the thickness and refractive index of ACAR glass made by a sol with silica and boron alkoxides, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 17.

FIG. 23 schematically illustrates the thickness and refractive index of ACAR glass made by a sol with silica and zirconium alkoxides, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 17.

FIG. 24 schematically illustrates morphologies of ACAR glass measured by AFM. A: wt. ratio of Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ is 0.66 in sol with hybrid Al—Si alkoxide; B: wt. ratio of B₂O₃ to SiO₂ is 0.482 in sol with hybrid B—Si alkoxide; C: wt. ratio of ZrO₂ to SiO₂ is 1.024 in sol with hybrid Zr—Si alkoxide.

FIG. 25 schematically illustrates arithmetic average roughness, Ra, and root mean square roughness, Rm of ACAR glass, with the labels being the same as those provided in Table 18.

FIG. 26 schematically illustrates XRD patterns of ACAR glasses.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Many oxides of multivalent cations may impart some resistance to alkaline attack, such as oxides of zirconium, aluminum, beryllium, lanthanum and transition metal, such as iron, manganese, and chromium. For instance, the likelihood of phase separation may be reduced by the addition of Al₂O₃ in borosilicate glass, by which the mechanical and chemical stability of glass are improved. A strategy to improve durability of AR glass is to develop AR glass in connection with hybrid alkoxides, by which the structure of AR thin film can be modified by oxides with higher bond energy and stable network configurations.

Anti-corrosion and anti-reflection (ACAR) glass with high stability in a salt fog chamber test may be prepared using hybrid alkoxides, such as Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄, where R is CH₂CH₃ group, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide, respectively. The ACAR glass may be prepared by providing a sol with blended or mixed alkoxides, respectively. The performances of developed AR glass are evaluated by salt fog and copper accelerated acetic acid salt spray (CASS) testing. Compared with AR glass made by a sol with only silica alkoxide, greater durability existed in the ACAR glass made from hybrid alkoxides. Higher transmittance and lower reflection is also found with the developed ACAR glass. The morphologies of ACAR glasses are investigated by atomic force morphology (AFM), the optical performance of ACAR glass is studied using an Ellipsometer, and the mechanical stability of the ACAR thin film is examined using a crockmeter and a tape pull test.

Anti corrosion and reflection (ACAR) glasses with high durability are prepared by a sol gel process. A series of hybrid alkoxides, Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄ are used as binders of the sol, where R is CH₂CH₃, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide. Two kinds of sols are prepared to make ACAR glass; one is from blended sol with hybrid alkoxides, and another is from a mixed sol with hybrid alkoxides. A study indicated that higher transmittance can be observed by AR glass developed from a blended sol.

Meanwhile, ACAR glass made by blended sol demonstrates an improved durability, e.g., as determined using a salt fog chamber test. The developed ACAR glass can pass at least 61 days of salt fog chamber testing. The durability of the ACAR thin film may be attributed to the enhancement of bond dissociation energy and the restoration function from the network of hybrid alkoxides. The changes of optical thickness and refractive index of ACAR glasses made by different hybrid alkoxides are investigated by Ellipsometer measurement. Both thickness and refractive index of ACAR glass are similar with those developed by Si(OR)₄—nanoparticles. A rough surface is observed by AFM analysis and the measurement of water contact angle. Mechanical and adhesive strength of ACAR thin films are evaluated by a crockmeter and a tape pull tests. Durability of the ACAR glasses are further examined by water boil, NaOH solution, damp heat chamber, and copper accelerated acetic acid salt spray (CASS) chamber testing. Excellent optical performance of ACAR glass, along with improved durability, allows the developed ACAR glass be used in some harsh environments, such as high concentration of salt environment, and it can be also expected that the life time of ACAR glass used in solar panel applications would be extended.

In an aspect, the formulation may contain a weight ratio of Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ of 0.01 to 1.0, of 0.05 to 0.7, or of 0.1 to 0.5. The formulation may contain a weight ratio of B₂O₃ to SiO₂ of 0.01 to 1.0, of 0.05 to 0.7, or of 0.1 to 0.5. The formulation may contain a weight ratio of ZrO₂ to SiO₂ of 0.01 to 1.5, of 0.01 to 1.0, of 0.05 to 0.7, or of 0.1 to 0.5. The inventors envision that all weight ratios within those ranges may also be suitable in some instances.

In certain exemplary embodiments, the firing may occur in an oven at a temperature ranging preferably from 550 to 700° C. (and all sub-ranges therebetween), more preferably from 575 to 675° C. (and all sub-ranges therebetween), and even more preferably from 600 to 650° C. (and all sub-ranges therebetween). The firing may occur for a suitable length of time, such as between 1 and 10 minutes (and all sub-ranges therebetween) or between 3 and 7 minutes (and all sub-ranges therebetween).

In addition, the composition of the atmosphere's gas may be controlled during curing; that is, the curing may occur, for example, in an inert atmosphere of nitrogen and/or argon, or in an atmosphere or other suitable gas. Furthermore, partial curing is contemplated and included within the term “curing” and its variants.

Although the spin-coating method may be used for applying the sol to a substrate, the uncured coating may be deposited in any suitable manner, including, for example, roll-coating, spray-coating, flow-coating, dip-coating, curtain-coating, slot die coating, meniscus coating, and any other method of depositing the uncured coating on a substrate.

Similarly, any suitable heat-resistant substrate (such as any type of glass) may be used in certain example embodiments.

Experimental Materials

Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Aldrich), N-propyl alcohol (NPA, Aldrich), acetic acid (AcOH, Fischer), elongated silica nanoparticles (IPA-ST-UP, 15% in iso-propanol, Nissan), aluminum s-butoxide, (Al(s-OBu)₃, Gelest), boron n-butoxide (B(OBu)₃, Gelest) and zirconium n-butoxide (Zr(OBu)₄, Gelest) are used without purification. Deionized water with conductivity as 18 Ω/cm is used in the experiments described herein. Solar float glass (SFO, thickness of 3.2 mm) is received from Phoenicia (Guardian). SFO glass has a tin side and an air side, which can be recognized with short wavelength UV light (e.g., at 256 nm). Unless otherwise noted, the coated side was the tin side.

Preparation of Sols with Metal Alkoxide

Table 1 lists the formulations of sols with different metal alkoxides. A typical procedure to make a sol from metal alkoxides is as follows: 6 g of metal alkoxide such as Al(s-OBu)₃ is added into 100 g of glass bottle, then 25 g of NPA and 2 g of HNO₃ is added to this bottle. The sols are stirred at room temperature for 72 hours before use.

TABLE 1 Sols from metal alkoxides Chem. wt., g M.W. Mole Mole ratio wt. % Al(s-OBu)₃ Al(s-OBu)₃ 6 246.32 0.024 1.015 18.182 HNO3 (70%) 15M 2 63 0.022 0.926 6.061 NPA 25 60.1 0.416 17.332 75.758 B(OBu)₃ B(OBu)₃ 6 230.16 0.026 1.003 18.182 HNO₃ (70%) 15M 2 63 0.022 0.855 6.061 NPA 25 60.1 0.416 15.999 75.758 Zr(OBu)₄ Zr(OBu)₄ 6 383.68 0.016 1 18.182 HNO₃ (70%) 15M 2 63 0.022 1.421 6.061 NPA 25 60.1 0.416 26.6 75.758

Preparation of Sols Used for Making ACAR Glass by a Blended Approach

AR glass can be developed by blending sols with metal alkoxides and sols with silicon nanoparticles and siloxane. The formulation of a sol with silicon nanoparticles and siloxane used in this study is listed in Table 2 and is sometimes referred to herein as the Gen 1.5 Sol.

TABLE 2 Sol with silicon nanoparticle and siloxane Chem. M.W. (g/mol) Wt., g Mol NPA 60.100 69.704 1.160 Deionized water 18.000 1.808 0.100 Acetic acid (AcOH) 60.050 4.889 0.081 Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) 208.330 3.636 0.017 Nano silica particle (IPA-ST-UP) 60.000 19.948 0.332

15% of elongated nano-particle in IPA-ST-UP

IPA-ST-UP: 9-15 nm of diameter and 100-140 nm of length

4 wt. % of SiO₂

A typical procedure to prepare sols with silicon nanoparticles and siloxane is as follows: 67.47 g of NPA is added to 200 ml of glass bottle with magnetic stirrer bar. To this solution, 3.636 of TEOS, 19.948 g of IPA-UP-ST and 1.808 g of Deionized water subsequently is added. Then, 4.889 g of AcOH is added to solution and the sol is stirred immediately at room temperature for 24 hours. The sol with a solid percentage of 3 wt. % is prepared by diluting with NPA.

The silica nanoparticles include about 15 wt. % amorphous silica, 85 wt. % isopropanol and less than about 1 wt. % water. If elongated silica particles are used, they can range in diameter between 9-15 nm with an average length of 40-100 nm and with the OH group present in an amount of about 5-8 OH/nm². Water-based silica nanoparticles, such as SNOWTEX from Nissan Chemical, can also be used, with the size of silica nanoparticles ranging from 10-100 nm at a weight percentage of 20-40%.

In addition to elongated silica nanoparticles, spherical silica nanoparticles, such as those produced under the trade name ORGANOSILICASO (available from Nissan Chemical), having a particle size of between 9-15/40-100 nm, a wt. % SiO₂ of 15-16%, less than 1% water, a viscosity of less than 20 mPa·s and a specific gravity of between 0.85 and 0.90, can be used. The weight percentage of spherical silica nanoparticles in solution may range from 20-40%, which corresponds to 60-80% of solvent in the silica solution. Minor amounts of water in the range from 0.3 to 3 wt. % may also be present in the final solution.

For Gen 1.5 sols such as those in Table 2, the amount of solid SiO₂ may be about 4 wt. %. But the solid percentage can be from 0.6-10 wt. %, with the amount of solvent comprising 70-97 wt. %. The amount of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) used as a binder ranges from 0.3 to 20 mol %; the amount of acetic acid (which serves as a catalyst) may range from 0.01-7 mol %; and the molar ratio of water to silica ranges from 1.1 to 50.

Although acetic acid is mentioned, other acids or bases could be used in different examples. For instance, the catalyst could be an inorganic acid, an organic acid, or an inorganic base. Inorganic acids may include, for example, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, sulphuric acid, boric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydrobromic acid, perchloric acid, etc. Organic acids may include, for example, lactic acid, formic acid, citric acid, oxalic acid, uric acid, etc. Inorganic bases may include, for example, ammonium carbonate, ammonium hydroxide, barium hydroxide, cesium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, rubidium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, etc.

A typical solvent used in the silica solution may include alcohol, such as isopropanol, methanol, n-propanol, and ethanol. Other solvents may include N,N-dimethyl acetamide, ethylene glycol, ethylene glycol mono-n-propyl ether, methyl ethyl ketone, ethylene oxide, formamide, dimethylformamide, acetonitrile, dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, 2-ethoxyethanol, 2,2′,2″-nitrilotriethanol, and methyl isobutyl ketone. Isopropanol is the recommended solvent for silica nanoparticles ranging in size from 10 to 100 nm.

A blended sol is prepared by blending the sols with metal alkoxides listed in Table 1, with sols with silicon nanoparticles and siloxane listed in Table 2. Table 3 lists formulations of blended sol made by different metal alkoxides and silicon nanoparticles. A typical procedure is as follows: 0.05 g of sol with metal alkoxides is added in to a 25 ml glass bottle. To this bottle, 9.95 g of sol with silicon nanoparticles is added. The sol is stirred at room temperature for 24 hours before use.

TABLE 3 Blend sols from hybrid alkoxides Al(s-OBu)₃—Si(OR)₄ Al₂O₃/SiO₂, Al(s-OBu)₃ sol, g Gen 1.5 sol, 3%, g Total, g Al₂O₃, g SiO₂, g wt. ratio 0.050 9.950 10.000 0.019 0.299 0.063 0.100 9.900 10.000 0.038 0.297 0.127 0.500 9.500 10.000 0.188 0.285 0.660 B(OBu)₃—Si(OR)₄ B₂O₃/SiO₂, B(OBu)₃ sol, g Gen 1.5, 3%, g Total, g B₂O₃, g SiO₂, g wt. ratio 0.050 9.950 10.000 0.014 0.299 0.046 0.100 9.900 10.000 0.027 0.297 0.093 0.500 9.500 10.000 0.137 0.285 0.482 Zr(OBu)₄—Si(OR)₄ ZrO₂/SiO₂, Zr(OBu)₄ sol, g Gen 1.5, 3%, g Total, g ZrO₂, g SiO₂, g wt. ratio 0.050 9.950 10.000 0.029 0.299 0.098 0.100 9.900 10.000 0.058 0.297 0.197 0.500 9.500 10.000 0.292 0.285 1.024

ACAR Glass Made by Mixed Sols

Another approach of making ACAR glass is to use the mixed sol with hybrid alkoxides and silica particles. Tables 4, 5, and 6 list formulations of mixed sols from different hybrid alkoxides. A typical procedure of making sols is as follows: 17.5 g of NPA is added in 100 ml of glass bottle. To this bottle, 0.864 g of TEOS, 4.738 g of IPA-ST-UP and 0.227 g of Al(s-OBu)₃ sol is added subsequently. The sol is stirred for 24 hours at room temperature before adding 0.429 g of water, 1.161 g of acetic acid, and 0.076 g of HNO₃. Finally, the sol is stirred at room temperature for 24 hours and aged at room temperature for another four days.

TABLE 4 Mixed sols with hybrid alkoxides of Al(s-OBu)₃—Si(OR)₄ Chem. g Al(s-OBu)₃—Si(OR)₄ NPA 17.502 17.250 15.252 Deionized water 0.429 0.429 0.429 Acetic acid (AcOH) 1.161 1.161 1.161 HNO₃ (70%) 0.076 0.076 0.076 Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) 0.864 0.864 0.864 Nano silica particle (IPA-ST-UP)* 4.738 4.738 4.738 Al(OBu)3 0.227 0.450 2.273 Total 24.997 24.997 24.793 Al(s-OBu)₃, wt. % 0.909 1.800 9.167 Al₂O₃, g 0.047 0.093 0.470 SiO₂, g 0.959 0.959 0.959 Al₂O₃/SiO₂ wt. ratio 0.049 0.097 0.490 *15% of elongated silica nanoparticles

TABLE 5 Mixed sol with hybrid alkoxides of B(OBu)₃—Si(OR)₄ Chem. g B(OBu)₃—Si(OR)₄ NPA 17.502 17.250 15.252 Deionized water 0.429 0.429 0.429 Acetic acid (AcOH) 1.161 1.161 1.161 HNO₃ (70%) 0.076 0.076 0.076 Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) 0.864 0.864 0.864 Nano silica particle (IPA-ST-UP)* 4.738 4.738 4.738 B(OBu) 0.227 0.450 2.273 Total 24.997 24.997 24.793 B(OBu)3, wt. % 0.909 1.800 9.167 B₂O₃, g 0.034 0.068 0.344 SiO₂, g 0.959 0.959 0.959 B₂O₃/SiO₂ wt. ratio 0.036 0.071 0.358 *15% of elongated silica nanoparticles

TABLE 6 Mixed sol with hybrid alkoxides of Zr(OBu)₄—Si(OR)₄ Chem. g Zr(OBu)₄—Si(OR)₄ NPA 17.502 17.250 15.252 Deionized water 0.429 0.429 0.429 Acetic acid (AcOH) 1.161 1.161 1.161 HNO₃ (70%) 0.076 0.076 0.076 Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) 0.864 0.864 0.864 Nano silica particle (IPA-ST-UP)* 4.738 4.738 4.738 Zr(OBu)₄ 0.227 0.450 2.273 Total 24.997 24.997 24.793 Zr(OBu)₄, wt. % 0.909 1.800 9.167 ZrO₂, g 0.292 0.578 2.944 SiO₂, g 0.959 0.959 0.959 ZrO₂/SiO₂ wt. ratio 0.304 0.603 3.068 *15% of elongated silica nanoparticles

Preparation of ACAR Glass

SFO glass (3″×3″) with a thickness of 3.2 mm is washed by soap, rinsed with Deionized water, and dried with N₂ gas, respectively. Various sols are coated on surface of SFO glass using a spin coater. A typical spin coating speed is 1300 rpm, and a typical ramp is 255 rps. 2 ml of sol is transferred to the tin side of SFO glass mounted in a sample stage of the spin coater. The spin coating time is 30 sec. After spin coating, the back side of the coated glass is cleaned with tissue paper soaked with IPA. Then, the coated glass is heated in one box furnace at 650° C. for 3.5 min. A solid coated layer with a light blue color can be observed before heating, which indicates that partial condensation is occurred during spin coating. A stronger thin film is developed after heating, indicating that more condensation is carried out in heating process.

Characterization Transmittance of ACAR Glass

Transmittance of ACAR glass is evaluated by considering the change of Tqe % of raw glass and ACAR glass. Tqe % is measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy (PE-1050, PerkinElmer) from 400 to 1200 nm, and average Tqe % is calculated using following equation:

$\begin{matrix} {{{Tqe}\mspace{14mu} \%} = \frac{\sum\limits_{i = 400}^{1200}\left( {{Tqe}\mspace{14mu} \%} \right)_{i}}{\sum\limits_{i = 400}^{1200}N_{i}}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

The transmission gain ΔTqe % is calculated by subtracting Tqe % of raw glass from Tqe % of ACAR glass in the case of developed ACAR glass as shown in Eq. (2); and subtracting the pre Tqe % of ACAR glass from the post Tqe % of ACAR glass in the case of durability test as shown in Eq. (3).

ΔTqe%_(|OpticaACAR)=(Tqe%)_(ACAR)−(Tqe%)_(raw)  (2)

ΔTqe%_(|DurabilityACAR)=(Tqe%)_(psotACAR)−(Tqe%)_(preACAR)  (3)

Reflection of AR Glass

Broadband reflection of ACAR glass (400-1200 nm) is measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy meter (PE-1050, PerkinElmer). The average total refection, R % is calculated using Eq. (4):

$\begin{matrix} {{R\mspace{14mu} \%} = \frac{\sum\limits_{i = 400}^{1200}{{\rho_{h}\left( {\lambda_{i},\theta,h} \right)}{E_{\lambda}\left( \lambda_{i} \right)}{\Delta\lambda}_{i}}}{\sum\limits_{i = 400}^{1200}{{E_{\lambda}\left( \lambda_{i} \right)}{\Delta\lambda}_{i}}}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

where ρ_(h) (λ, θ, h) is the hemispherical reflection spectrum; E_(λ) (λ_(i)) is the direct solar irradiance spectrum, and Δλ is the wavelength interval. The wavelength interval used herein is 5 nm, although other wavelength intervals could have been used.

The reflection gain, ΔR % is calculated by subtracting R % of raw glass from R % of ACAR glass in the case of developed ACAR glass as shown in Eq. (5);

ΔR%_(|OpticaACAR)=(R%)_(coatedACAR)−(R%)_(raw)  (5)

Water Contact Angle

A contact angle instrument (FTA 135) is used to measure water contact angle of ACAR glass at room temperature. One sessile drop of Deionized water (˜2.3 μl) is wetted on the surface of glass and the water contact angle is immediately measured. The data is the average values tested from three points on glass surface. The calculation of contact angle is performed by software (FTA, version 1.966).

Atomic Force Morphology (AFM)

The topography of ACAR glass is investigated by atomic force microscope (AFM, AP-0100, Parker Sci. Instrument). The non-contact method, preferred for soft surfaces in general, is used. The size of sample is about 1 cm×1 cm and the scanning area is 5 μm×5 μm. The scanning rate is 0.5. The surface roughness is quantitatively characterized by measuring the arithmetic average roughness, R_(a), and root mean square roughness, R_(m). The definition of R_(a) and R_(m) is described in following equations.

$\begin{matrix} {R_{a} = {\frac{1}{n}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{y_{i}}}}} & (6) \\ {R_{m} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{n}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}y_{i}^{2}}}} & (7) \end{matrix}$

where y_(i) is the height of peak in AFM image.

XRD Analysis

The surface phase structure of ACAR glass is analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 advance, Bruker axs, CuKα). The scan rate is 1.2 degree/min. and scan range is from 20 degrees to 65 degrees.

Ellipsometer

Optical thickness and refractive index of ACAR glass were measured using an ellipsometer (J. A. Woollam Co., HS-190). The refractive index of ACAR glass was reported at a wavelength of 550 nm. The complex reflectance ratio ρ of a thin film is a function of the ellipsometric factors of ψ and Δ. The fundamental equation of ellipsometry is described as follows:

Σ=tan ψe ^(1Δ) =f(n ₁ ,n ₂ ,n,φ,d,λ,k)  (8)

where n₁, n₂ and n represent the refractive index of the air, substrate, and film, respectively. Φ and λ represent the incident angle and wavelength of incident light, respectively. D and k are the thickness and extinction coefficient of the thin film. The optical constants and thickness of the glass substrate and thin film coating layer are kept constant in the examples described herein (although this need not always be the case). The relationship of ψ-λ and Δ-λ are fitted under incident angle of 75 degree after adjusting n, d, and k. Fitting the optical constants of thin films with a Cauchy dispersion model can be described as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{n(\lambda)} = {A + \frac{B}{\lambda^{2}} + \frac{C}{\lambda^{4}} + \cdots}} & (9) \end{matrix}$

Eq. (9) coordinates ellipsometric parameters to allow for the determination of both thickness and optical constants for most transparent thin films. The mean square error (MSE) is a destination function that can be used to evaluate the quality of the match between measured and model calculated data. The MSE can be described as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{MSE} = {\frac{1}{{2N} - M}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\left\lbrack {\left( \frac{\psi_{i}^{mod} - \psi_{i}^{\exp}}{\sigma_{\psi,i}^{\exp}} \right)^{2} + \left( \frac{\Delta_{i}^{mod} - \Delta_{i}^{\exp}}{\sigma_{\Delta,i}^{\exp}} \right)^{2}} \right\rbrack}}} & (10) \end{matrix}$

where Δ and ψ are the ellipsometric factors, the superscript “mod” refers to the calculated data, and the superscript “exp” refers to the experimental data. N is the number of (ψ, Δ). M is the number of variable parameters. Σ is the standard mean square deviation.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

The chemical species and concentration of sols are analyzed by GC-MS (Agilent G1701DA). The column temperature is 340° C., and the heating ramp is 15° C./min. The carried gas of GC-MS analysis is Helium. The volume of the sample is 0.2 μl and the liquid sample is injected using a glass syringe. The chemical structure of the unknown fragment is identified by the data stored in MS library.

Durability Tests

Water Boil

The water boil test involves the following testing procedure. ACAR glass is immersed in one beaker filled with Deionized water at 100° C. After 10 min, the ACAR glass is removed from the boiling water and dried using N₂ gas before UV-vis measurement. The change of Tqe % will be calculated as the difference of Tqe % before and after water boil test. The water boil test is failed when ΔTqe % is larger than −0.5%.

NaOH Solution (0.1N)

The NaOH test involves the following testing procedure. ACAR glass is immersed in NaOH solution (0.1 N) filled in one beaker at room temperature. After 1 hour, the glass is taken from solution, rinsed using Dcionized water and dried using N₂ gas. The change of Tqe % will be calculated as the difference of Tqe % before and after NaOH test. The water boil test is failed when ΔTqe % is larger than −0.5%.

Tape Pull

The tape pull test involves the following testing procedure. The tape (3179C, 3M) is adhered on the surface of the ACAR glass by pressing the tape with one's finger. After 1.5 minutes, the tape is pulled off quickly by hand and the residual adhesive of the tape will be removed with tissue paper (AccuWipe) soaked in NPA. The change of Tqe % will be calculated as the difference of Tqe % before and after tape pull test. The tape pull test is failed when ΔTqe % is larger than 1.5%.

Crockmeter

The crockmeter test involves a SDL Atlas CM-5 crockmeter. The size of the glass is 3″×3″ and the total test cycle number is 750. The crockmeter test fails when ΔTqe % is larger than 1.5%.

Salt Fog Test

ACAR glasses are set in a salt fog chamber. The testing solution is made by mixing 0.013 g of NaOH and 186 g of NaCl. The pH of testing solution is in the range from 6.5 to 7.2. The testing solution is circulated using one pump and sprayed inside chamber. The chamber temperature is 35° C. and the pressure is 16 psi. The condensation of the testing solution on ACAR glass surface can enhance the damage of ACAR thin film. The Tqe % gain of ACAR glass is evaluated after a certain time. The glass is washed using tissue paper soaked with IPA before measurement of UV-Vis. The salt fog test is considered failed when ΔTqe % is larger than 2.0% after 4 days of testing.

Copper Accelerated Acetic Acid Salt Spray (CASS) Testing

The solution used in CASS test consists of 0.94 g of CuCl₂, 4.6 g of acetic acid and 258 g of NaCl. The chamber temperature is 49° C. and the pressure is 18 psi. The pH of solution is from 3.1 to 3.1 The change of Tqe % gain of ACAR glass is evaluated using UV-Vis measurement and the glass is washed using tissue paper soaked with IPA before measurement. The CASS test is failed when ΔTqe % is larger than 2.0% after 4 days of testing.

Damp Heat Test

A chamber at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity is used to evaluate the stability of the ACAR thin film. ACAR glasses are set in a sample holder for 10 days. The change of transmittance of ACAR glasses is evaluated using UV-Vis measurement. The glass is washed using tissue paper soaked with IPA before measurement. The damp heat test is failed when ΔTqe % is larger than 1.5% after 10 days of testing.

Results and Discussion Solution Chemistry of Alkoxide-Inclusive Precursors

Hydrolysis and condensation are basic chemical reactions in alkoxides. Hydrolysis produces functional groups that can be further condensed. During the condensation, three dimensional cross-linked networks are generated. Normally, the hydrolysis of silica alkoxide, such as Si(OR)₄ is much slower than that of Al(s-OBu)₃, B(OBu)₃ and Zr(OBu)₄ since partial charge of the metal in silica alkoxide is lower.

Hydrolysis

Hydrolysis of Boron Alkoxide

In B(OBu)₃, boron is trigonal coplanar with sp² hybridization, by which an empty 2pz orbital is accessible to other electrons and makes boron have a very electrophilic character. Water molecules with enriched negative charged-on oxygen atom can attack trigonal boron, and hydrolysis is carried out according to an SN₂ mechanism. An intermediate is generated as shown in FIG. 1 and hydrolyzed B(OBu)₃ is formed with leaving of ROH.

Hydrolysis of Al(s-OBu)₃

Similar to the hydrolysis mechanism of B(OBu)₃, Al(s-OBu)₃ undergoes SN₂ hydrolysis. Hydrolyzed Al(s-OBu)₃ is generated after the leaving of ROH from the intermediate as shown in FIG. 2.

Hydrolysis of Zr(OBu)₄

Unlike most other metal alkoxides, zirconium undergoes hydrolysis based on the mechanism of de-alcoholation. First, one proton attacks the oxygen atoms of the alkoxides, by which hydrolyzed Zr(OBu)₄ is generated, leaving of CH₂CH₂CH₂CH₃. In the following step, this new hydroxo ligand separates from the complex together with another alkoxy group, thereby allowing the creation of the first Zr═O double bond. Those two first steps are repeated for the last two OR groups of the initial alkoxide so that the final product, ZrO₂, is a pure oxide as shown in FIG. 3.

Hydrolysis of Si(OR)₄

FIG. 4 shows the hydrolysis of TEOS with an acid as the catalyst. SN₂ mechanisms can be used to describe the hydrolysis of TEOS. First, the electrophilicity of the Si atom is enhanced by the attack of a proton on the OR group of TEOS. This proton is released from acetic acid. Now, the Si atom with more electrophilicity is easily attacked by the water molecule, and one intermediate is generated as shown in FIG. 4. The further reaction of the intermediate produces the hydrolyzed TEOS and releases a proton, H⁺, which can be used again as the catalyst. This is a reversible process, and it can be repeated to generate various hydrolyzed TEOS molecules such as, for example, silicic acid Si(OH)₄, as fully hydrolyzed TEOS. The literature suggests that apart from the reversible hydrolysis of TEOS, an esterification also exists in the process.

Condensation

Condensation of Hydrolyzed B(OBu)₃

FIG. 5 shows the process of condensation of hydrolyzed B(OBu)₃. Apart from the trigonal state of boron, there is tetrahedral state of boron in solution. When boron is in a tetrahedral state, boron exists as neither a 2p nor a low d orbital available, as would be necessary for eventual sp³d hybridization. It is quite stable and prevails in solution. Initial products could be dimer, trimer, and tetramer after condensation, as shown in FIG. 5. Further condensation will result in a cross-linked network.

Condensation of Hydrolyzed Al(s-OBu)₃

FIG. 6 shows the condensation of hydrolyzed Al(s-OBu)₃. When aluminum alkoxides condense, a double oxygen bridge forms between two aluminum atoms. A series of oligomers could be generated during the condensation. The extent of oligomerization of aluminum alkoxides depends mainly on the steric bulk of the alkoxides ligand.

Condensation of Hydrolyzed Zr(OBu)₄

FIG. 7 shows the condensation of hydrolyzed Zr(OBu)₄. Similar to the mechanism of SN₂, the zirconium atom is more electrophilic after a proton attack on one hydroxyl group. With the attacking of the hydroxyl group on another hydrolyzed Zr(OBu)₄, one bonded O—Zr—O chain is generated, as shown in FIG. 7.

Condensation of Si(OR)₄

The hydrolyzed Si(OR)₄ can be further condensed by route of water and alcohol condensation, as shown in FIG. 8. The reversible reaction is hydrolysis and alcoholysis. First, a proton will attack the oxygen atom in a hydroxyl group of hydrolyzed alkoxysilane, which increases the electrophilicity of the Si atom, and it is now easily attacked by the hydroxyl group from the hydrolyzed alkoxysilane molecule. One water molecule is released from the intermediate and H₃ ⁺O is generated from water and a proton.

Mechanisms of ACAR Glass Made Using Hybrid Alkoxides

Hydrolysis of AR Thin Film without Hybrid Aalkoxides

The hydrolysis mechanism of the AR thin film can be described by FIG. 9. There are many oxygen-bridge ions existing in normal soda-lime-silica based glass with no long-range order, although a short range order is sometimes possible. The introduction of some alkaline oxides, such as Na₂O can hydrolyze silica-oxygen bonds to form non oxygen bridge ions, e.g., as shown in FIG. 9. The extra electronic charge of non oxygen bridge ions is neutralized by alkaline ions. The presence of non oxygen ions may damage the substantially integral and symmetrical glass structure, which can degrade properties of glass such as, for example, chemical stability and mechanical strength. The presence of non oxygen ions also enables the electron density to be withdrawn from silicon. As a result, silicon is more electrophilic and thus more susceptible to attack from water. Minor hydroxyl groups in a salt fog solution and Na⁺ ions migrating from the glass bulk to the AR thin film also can attack the silicon atoms, e.g., by a SN₂—Si mechanism, in which OH— displaces OR— with inversion of the silicon tetrahedron. The attack by the hydroxyl group may be affected by both steric and inductive factors, and one five-coordinate intermediate is generated. The intermediate decays through broken bonds of siloxanes, by which the glass is damaged by the hydrolyzed siloxane, again as shown in FIG. 9.

Repair Mechanism of ACAR Glass Made by Hybrid Alkoxides

FIG. 10 shows the mechanism of ACAR glass made by hybrid alkoxides of Al₂O₃ and SiO₂. Al³⁺ can exist in silica materials with two different coordinates, namely, octahedral and tetrahedral. In soda-lime glass, Al³⁺ generally is in a tetrahedral structure when the ratio of Al₂O₃ to Na₂O is less than one. Al³⁺ can catch one non oxygen bridge ion to generate an Al⁴⁺ tetrahedral structure, which connects with Si—O tetrahedral structures and repairs the broken network. Uniform or substantially uniform three dimensional networks can enhance integrity and symmetry of the glass matrixes, which consequently increases the chemical stability of glass.

Increasing of Bond Dissociation Energy of ACAR Thin Film

The chemical structure of ACAR glass made by hybrid alkoxides can be schematically illustrated, e.g., as shown in FIG. 11. By introducing a non-silica element such as B, Al, and/or Zr, the chemical durability of the final AR thin film can be effectively improved. This is because partial bonding from Si—O—X (X: B, Al, and/or Zr) in the network of Si—O—Si enhances the bond dissociation energy of network. The bond dissociation energies of different oxides are summarized in Table 7. It is clear that the bond dissociation energies of B—O, Al—O, and Zr—O are higher than that of Si—O.

TABLE 7 Bond dissociation energy of different oxides Bond Oxide Bond energy (KJ/mol) Si—O SiO₂ 315 B—O B₂O₃ 774 Al—O Al₂O₃ 484 Zr—O ZrO₂ 753

Example Results GC-MS Spectra of Sols

FIGS. 12, 13, and 14 show the GC-MS spectra of partial sols used in this study. As shown in FIG. 12, the peaks of water, ethylanol, iso-propanol, n-propanol, and n-propyl acetate are found in GC spectrum of Gen 1.5 sol, which is one sol with TEOS and silica nanoparticles. The ethylanol is a byproduct of the hydrolysis of TEOS. Similarly, n-propyl acetate is the reactant of acetic acid and n-propanol at high temperature. There is no peak of TEOS, which suggests that almost all TEOS is hydrolyzed after certain aging time.

FIG. 13 shows the GC-MS spectrum of a sol with Al(s-OBu)₃. In addition to peaks of NPA as a major ingredient in sol, other chemical compounds, such as 1-propene-2-methyl, propanol, and 2-butanol, are found. 2-butanol and propanol could be fragments of s-OBu, and 1-propene-2-methyl could be rearrangement of some fragments.

FIG. 14 shows the GC-MS spectrum of a sol with hybrid alkoxides from Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃. The peaks that appeared in FIGS. 12 and 13 can be found in FIG. 14, as well. Meanwhile, new peaks attributed to acetic acid, 1-methylester and n-propyl acetate could be the condensation reactants of acetic acid and different alcohols.

Tqe % Gain of ACAR Glass

Table 8 lists the transmittance and Tqe % gain of ACAR glass made using a blended sol with different hybrid alkoxides. FIG. 15 shows the transmittance curves with changing wavelengths. For comparison purposes, the data of AR glass made with the Gen 1.5 sot is provided in Table 8 and FIG. 15. It is clear that ACAR glasses demonstrate higher transmittance than anti-reflection glass. Tqe % gain is in the range from 3.03% to 3.22%, depending on the composition and kind of alkoxides. It is also clear that Tqe % gain of ACAR glass is close to that of AR glass developed by Gen 1.5 sol. In certain example embodiments, the Tqe % gain is at least 2.5%, more preferably at least 3.0%, and still more preferably at least 3.2%.

TABLE 8 Transmittance and Tqe % gain of ACAR glass Wt. ratio of metal Tqe oxide to Peak Tqe % Tqe % % ID Glass Sol SiO₂ (nm) raw ACAR gain GEN 1.5 SFO-Sn Si — 705 90.822 94.069 3.247 3% 396-13-1 SFO-Sn Al—Si 0.063 695 90.822 94.014 3.193 396-13-2 SFO-Sn Al—Si 0.127 610 90.822 94.016 3.195 396-13-3 SFO-Sn Al—Si 0.660 580 90.822 93.841 3.020 396-13-4 SFO-Sn B—Si 0.046 610 90.822 94.055 3.233 396-13-5 SFO-Sn B—Si 0.093 610 90.822 94.054 3.232 396-13-6 SFO-Sn B—Si 0.482 565 90.822 94.006 3.184 396-13-7 SFO-Sn Zr—Si 0.098 610 90.822 94.024 3.202 396-13-8 SFO-Sn Zr—Si 0.197 645 90.822 94.043 3.221 396-13-9 SFO-Sn Zr—Si 1.024 505 90.822 93.928 3.107

Reflection of ACAR Glass

In order to confirm the optical performance of ACAR glass, the reflection of ACAR glass is measured. The data are summarized in Table 9. It is clear that the reflection values of ACAR glass is close to that of AR glass made using the Gen 1.5 sol. FIG. 16 shows the reflection curve of ACAR glass with a broadband range from 400 to 1200 nm. The reflection of ACAR glass is almost half of that from raw SFO glass, e.g., as shown in Table 9 and FIG. 16.

TABLE 9 Reflection of ACAR glass wt. ratio of R % metal oxide raw R % ID Glass Sol to SiO₂ glass ACAR R % gain SFO-REF SFO/Sn — — 8.318 8.318 0.000 396-34-1 SFO/Sn Si — 8.318 4.995 −3.323 GEN1.5 396-34-4 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.063 8.318 5.073 −3.244 396-34-6 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.127 8.318 5.021 −3.297 396-34-8 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.660 8.318 5.067 −3.251

Transmittance of ACAR Glass Made Using Mixed Sols

The transmittances of ACAR glasses made using mixed sols are evaluated, and the data are summarized in Table 10. It can be seen that a lower Tqe % gain is achieved with mixed sol, as compared with ACAR glass made using a blended sol. Faster hydrolysis of Al(s-OBu)₃, B(OBu)₃, and Zr(OBu)₄ may alter the structure of the ACAR thin film and porosity, which can affect the optical performance of ACAR glass. FIG. 17 shows the transmittance of ACAR glass made by mixed sols.

TABLE 10 Transmittance and Tqe % gain of ACAR glass made by mixed sols Hybrid wt. Peak Tqe %, Tqe % Tqe % ID sol ratio (nm) raw ACAR gain 396-17-1 Zr—Si 0.304 570 90.822 93.034 2.212 396-17-2 Zr—Si 0.603 605 90.822 93.082 2.260 396-17-3 Zr—Si 3.68 500 90.822 91.428 0.606 396-17-4 Al—Si 0.049 685 90.822 93.559 2.737 396-17-5 Al—Si 0.097 850 90.822 93.235 2.413 396-17-6 Al—Si 0.49 500 90.822 92.328 1.506 396-17-7 B—Si 0.036 595 90.822 93.396 2.574 396-17-8 B—Si 0.071 610 90.822 93.287 2.465 396-17-9 B—Si 0.358 500 90.822 91.062 0.240

Salt Fog Test of ACAR Glass Made Using Blended Sols

Table 11 lists the change of Tqe % gain with salt fog testing times. It was observed that one sample of AR glass made using the Gen 1.5 sol failed after 4 days of testing, but all AR glass made using the Gen 1.5 sol fail after 9 days of testing. However, all ACAR glasses made using hybrid alkoxides passed four days of salt fog tests. ACAR glasses made using sols less than 0.482, weight ratio of B₂O₃ to SiO₂ can pass fifteen days of test. It thus will be appreciated that a ratio of 0.75 or less, 0.6 or less, and more preferably 0.5 or less, is desirable when it comes to extending survival times, at least in some cases. ACAR glass made using a sol with hybrid silica and zirconium alkoxides can pass 15 days of test when weight ratio of ZrO₂ to SiO₂ is higher than 1.024. This ratio preferably is 0.8 or higher, more preferably 0.9 or higher, and still more preferably 1.0 or higher. ACAR glasses made from sols with silica and aluminum alkoxides passed 61 days of test. It was found that the ACAR glass thin film after 61 days of testing was still strongly adhered to the glass surface and, therefore, longer life time can be expected in some cases.

When the amount of boron is lower in an ACAR thin film, B³⁺ can exist with the tetrahedral structure of [BO₄]. This is because B³⁺ can catch one non oxygen bridge ion to generate B⁴⁺ tetrahedral structure, which connects with a Si—O tetrahedral structure together and repairs broken networks, e.g., as shown in FIG. 10. The formation of the B⁴⁺ tetrahedral structure plays a role in repairing broken bonds and improving the strength of the glass network. When more boron is used in ACAR thin film, B³⁺ will be back to the octahedral structure, by which the durability of AR thin film will be decreased. It can be expected that the durability of an ACAR thin film will decrease when the amount of Al is increased. The durability increase of AR thin film made using a sol with Zr(OBu)₄ could be attributed to the bond dissociation energy of Zr—O. More Zr—O bonds in the ACAR thin film may improve chemical resistance.

TABLE 11 Salt Fog Test of ACAR Glass Made Using a Blended Sol 0 days Tqe % 4 days 9 days X/SiO₂, Peak raw Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % ID Sol wt. ratio (nm) SFO AR pre gain AR gain AR gain 396-34-1 Gen 1.5 3% — 680 90.822 94.008 3.186 93.977 −0.031 90.928 −3.080 396-34-2 Gen 1.5 3% — 610 90.822 94.041 3.219 94.047  0.005 90.922 −3.119 Gen 1.5 Gen 1.5 3% — 705 90.822 94.069 3.247 91.055 −3.013 — — 396-13-1 Si—Al 0.063 695 90.822 94.014 3.192 93.952 −0.063 93.940 −0.074 396-13-2 Si—Al 0.127 615 90.822 94.016 3.194 93.987 −0.030 93.969 −0.047 396-13-3 Si—Al 0.66 595 90.822 93.841 3.019 93.862  0.020 93.909  0.068 396-13-4 Si—B 0.046 615 90.822 94.055 3.233 94.013 −0.042 94.002 −0.053 396-13-5 Si—B 0.093 610 90.822 94.054 3.232 94.053 −0.001 94.009 −0.045 396-13-6 Si—B 0.482 570 90.822 94.006 3.184 93.965 −0.041 90.983 −3.023 396-13-7 Si—Zr 0.098 685 90.822 94.024 3.202 94.025  0.001 91.443 −2.581 396-13-8 Si—Zr 0.197 610 90.822 94.043 3.221 94.016 −0.027 94.008 −0.035 396-13-9 Si—Zr 1.024 685 90.822 93.928 3.106 94.004  0.076 — — 15 days 20 days 36 days 61 days X/SiO₂, Peak Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % ID Sol wt. ratio (nm) AR gain AR gain AR gain AR gain 396-34-1 Gen 1.5 3% — 680 — — — — — — — — 396-34-2 Gen 1.5 3% — 610 — — — — — — — — Gen 1.5 Gen 1.5 3% — 705 — — — — — — — — 396-13-1 Si—Al 0.063 695 93.968 −0.046 93.990 −0.024 90.869 −3.146 396-13-2 Si—Al 0.127 615 93.938 −0.078 93.921 −0.095 93.519 −0.497 93.947 −0.069 396-13-3 Si—Al 0.66 595 93.902  0.061 93.963  0.121 93.953  0.111 94.052  0.211 396-13-4 Si—B 0.046 615 93.892 −0.163 93.814 −0.240 90.981 −3.073 — — 396-13-5 Si—B 0.093 610 93.372 −0.682 92.463 −1.591 90.961 −3.093 — — 396-13-6 Si—B 0.482 570 90.938 −3.068 — — — — — — 396-13-7 Si—Zr 0.098 685 91.355 −3.165 — — — — — — 396-13-8 Si—Zr 0.197 610 90.859 −2.688 — — — — — — 396-13-9 Si—Zr 1.024 685 93.964  0.035 93.864 −0.065 91.100 −2.828 — — Underline: fail Bold: pass X: Al, B, Zr

Salt Fog Test of ACAR Glass Made Using Mixed Sols

The durability of ACAR glass made using mixed sols is also evaluated by salt fog chamber testing, and the results are presented in Table 12. All ACAR glassed made using hybrid alkoxides from Zr(OBu)₄—Si(OR)₄ pass 4 days of testing, and it was found that there is an increase of Tqe % gain during salt fog testing. Most of the ACAR glass samples made using hybrid alkoxides from B(OBu)₃—Si(OR)₄ faired well after 4 days of salt fog test.

TABLE 12 Tqe % gain of ACAR glass made by mixed hybrid alkoxides during salt fog test Wt. ratio of metal oxide to ID sol SiO₂ Tqe % pre Tqe % post Tqe % gain 396-17-1 Zr—Si 0.304 93.034 93.747 0.713 396-17-2 Zr—Si 0.603 93.082 93.690 0.608 396-17-3 Zr—Si 3.68 91.428 91.686 0.258 396-17-4 Al—Si 0.049 93.559 93.640 0.081 396-17-5 Al—Si 0.097 93.235 93.352 0.117 396-17-6 Al—Si 0.49 92.328 92.111 −0.217 396-17-7 B—Si 0.036 93.396 90.978 −2.418 396-17-8 B—Si 0.071 93.287 90.970 −2.317 396-17-9 B—Si 0.358 91.062 91.077 0.015

Repeatability Test

ACAR glasses from different hybrid alkoxides are prepared in order to check repeatability of the procedure. Table 13 shows the optical performance of ACAR glass prepared during repeatability testing. Tqe % gain above 3.0% with an error range from 0.043 to 0.14 is achieved for prepared ACAR glasses. FIGS. 18, 19, and 20 show the transmittance curves of ACAR glass made by different hybrid alkoxides. Typical transmittance curves of anti reflection glass can be observed with higher transmittance from 600 to 700 nm. Meanwhile, low transmittance can be seen in far infrared and near UV region.

TABLE 13 Optical performance of ACAR glass prepared in repeatability process wt. ratio of metal Peak Ave. oxide pre Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % ID Sol to SiO₂ (nm) raw ACAR gain gain STD 396-13-3-1 Al—Si 0.66 630 90.769 93.969 3.200 3.128 0.14098722 396-13-3-2 Al—Si 0.66 620 90.769 93.970 3.201 396-13-3-3 Al—Si 0.66 635 90.769 93.996 3.227 396-13-3-4 Al—Si 0.66 600 90.769 93.617 2.848 396-13-3-5 Al—Si 0.66 585 90.769 93.923 3.154 396-13-3-6 Al—Si 0.66 615 90.769 93.906 3.137 396-13-6-1 B—Si 0.482 560 90.769 93.797 3.028 3.094 0.05439952 396-13-6-2 B—Si 0.482 580 90.769 93.872 3.104 396-13-6-3 B—Si 0.482 580 90.769 93.919 3.151 396-13-6-4 B—Si 0.482 575 90.769 93.919 3.151 396-13-6-5 B—Si 0.482 565 90.769 93.869 3.100 396-13-6-6 B—Si 0.482 565 90.769 93.800 3.031 396-13-9-1 Zr—Si 1.024 600 90.769 93.931 3.163 3.130 0.04332733 396-13-9-2 Zr—Si 1.024 595 90.769 93.905 3.136 396-13-9-3 Zr—Si 1.024 565 90.769 93.815 3.047 396-13-9-4 Zr—Si 1.024 620 90.769 93.932 3.163 396-13-9-5 Zr—Si 1.024 580 90.769 93.915 3.146 396-13-9-6 Zr—Si 1.024 600 90.769 93.896 3.128

Adhesive and Mechanical Strength of ACAR Glass

The durability of ACAR glasses also is evaluated by water boil, NaOH solution (0.1N), tape pull, and crockmeter tests. Water boil and NaOH solution tests can be used to evaluate the chemical stability of ACAR glass. Tape pull and crockmeter tests can be used to judge the mechanical strength of the ACAR thin film. Table 14 lists the measurement results. It can be seen from Table 14 that all ACAR glasses passed these additional durability tests. At 100° C., it is possible that the water dissolves molecularly into the glass and reacts with the silicon-oxygen lattice to generate —SiOH groups. This reaction can cause a dramatic change in the mechanical strength of thin film. It was reported during this molecular diffusion that the concentration of alkali in the bulk of the glass is unaffected, except by ion exchange just at the glass surface. The data shown in Table 14 indicates that the diffusion of water into glass is limited; therefore, the mechanical properties, especially the adhesive strength of thin film, was not affected.

An increase of Tqe % gain of ACAR glass also was observed after water boil and NaOH solution tests. During water boil and NaOH solution tests, residual burn chemicals inside the ACAR thin film can be further removed and the porosity of thin film can be enlarged, which is beneficial to the improvement of the anti-reflection properties of the thin film. More decreases of Tqe % gain can be seen during the tape pull test for ACAR glass, which could be attributed to an attack from the solvent, IPA, during the cleaning process.

TABLE 14 Adhesive and mechanical strength of ACAR glass Wt. ratio of Peak metal oxide pre Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % ID Glass Test Sol to SiO₂ (nm) pre post gain 396-13-3-1 SFO/Sn Crockmeter Al—Si 0.66 630 93.969 93.671 −0.298 396-13-3-2 SFO/Sn Tape pull Al—Si 0.66 620 93.970 93.573 −0.397 396-13-3-3 SFO/Sn Water boil Al—Si 0.66 635 93.996 94.107 0.111 396-13-3-4 SFO/Sn NaOH Al—Si 0.66 600 93.617 93.905 0.288 396-13-6-1 SFO/Sn Crockmeter B—Si 0.482 560 93.797 93.641 −0.156 396-13-6-2 SFO/Sn Tape pull B—Si 0.482 580 93.872 93.266 −0.607 396-13-6-3 SFO/Sn Water boil B—Si 0.482 580 93.919 94.053 0.134 396-13-6-4 SFO/Sn NaOH B—Si 0.482 575 93.919 94.093 0.173 396-13-9-1 SFO/Sn Crockmeter Zr—Si 1.024 600 93.931 93.751 −0.180 396-13-9-2 SFO/Sn Tape pull Zr—Si 1.024 595 93.905 93.680 −0.225 396-13-9-3 SFO/Sn Water boll Zr—Si 1.024 565 93.815 93.949 0.134 396-13-9-4 SFO/Sn NaOH Zr—Si 1.024 620 93.932 94.108 0.176

CASS Test of ACAR Glass

Table 15 lists CASS test results of ACAR glasses with a testing period of four days. All ACAR glass passed CASS testing, and the increased Tqe % gain in some AR glass after CASS testing is observed. The acidity environment presented in the CASS chamber may not pose a risk to the ACAR glass, as sodium hydroxyl (NaOH) formed during the migration of sodium ions from glass can be neutralized by acetic acid. Increased Tqe % gain may be attributed to washing of residual burn chemicals inside the thin film as observed in water boil and NaOH solution testing.

TABLE 15 Tqe % gain of ACAR glass during CASS test Wt. ratio of metal oxide Peak pre Tqe % Tqe % Tqe % ID Glass Sol to SiO₂ (nm) pre post gain 396-13-3-5 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.66 585 93.923 93.991 0.068 396-13-6-5 SFO/Sn B—Si 0.482 565 93.869 93.980 0.111 396-13-9-5 SFO/Sn Zr—Si 1.024 580 93.915 94.034 0.119

Damp Heat Test of ACAR Glass

The durability of ACAR glass is further evaluated by damp heat testing. High temperature and high humidity in the damp heat chamber can speed the damage of the AR thin film. However, table 16 shows that there is no significant decrease of Tqe % gain of ACAR glass with 10 days of damp heat test, which indicates stronger binding existed in the ACAR thin films.

TABLE 16 Tqe % gain change of ACAR glass during damp heat test Wt. ratio of metal oxide to Peak pre ID Glass Sol SiO₂ (nm) Tqe % pre Tqe % post Tqe % gain 396-13-3-6 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.66 615 93.906 93.819 −0.087 396-13-6-6 SFO/Sn B—Si 0.482 565 93.800 93.690 −0.110 396-13-9-6 SFO/Sn Zr—Si 1.024 600 93.896 93.581 −0.316

Thickness and Refractive Index of ACAR Glass

The optical thickness and refractive index (R.I.) of ACAR glass is investigated using an Ellipsometer, and the data is summarized in Table 17. With the increase of Al(s-OBu)₃ or B(OBu)₃ amount in sols, the thickness of the ACAR thin film is decreased, but the refractive index shows an increasing trend. However, the increase of thickness and decrease of refractive index is observed for AR glass made using a sol with hybrid zirconium and silica alkoxides. The reverse changes of thickness and reflective index with composition might be ascribed to the different structures of the ACAR thin film. A more dense structure might be present in ACAR thin films made using Si—Al or Si—B hybrid alkoxies, as those thin films demonstrate higher refractive indexes with increases of Al and/or B amounts in the thin films. On the other hand, more porous structures might be observed in thin films made using Si—Zr hybrid alkoxides. FIGS. 21, 22, and 23 show the relationship among the composition, thickness, and refractive index of various ACAR glasses.

TABLE 17 Change of thickness and refractive index of ACAR glass with composition Wt. ratio of metal oxide Thickness ID Glass Sol to SiO₂ MSE (nm) R.I. 396-13-1 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.063 0.754 145.157 1.257 396-13-2 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.127 0.687 132.92 1.253 396-13-3 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.66 0.323 125.037 1.290 396-13-4 SFO/Sn B—Si 0.046 0.9199 138 1.260 396-13-5 SFO/Sn B—Si 0.093 1.073 132.878 1.225 396-13-6 SFO/Sn B—Si 0.482 1.302 121.456 1.277 396-13-7 SFO/Sn Zr—Si 0.098 8.209 134.554 1.266 396-13-8 SFO/Sn Zr—Si 0.197 0.377 138.409 1.252 396-13-9 SFO/Sn Zr—Si 1.024 0.7227 140.914 1.213

Surface Morphology of ACAR Glass

FIG. 24 shows morphologies of ACAR glasses made by hybrid alkoxides. Table 18 and FIG. 25 present statistical data concerning surface roughness. It is clear that surface roughness increases with the order of ACAR glass made using Si—Al, B—Si, and Zr—Si.

TABLE 18 Arithmetic average roughness, R_(a), and root mean square roughness, R_(m), of ACAR glass Wt. ratio of Glass/ metal coated oxide ID side Sol to SiO₂ Rm STD Ra STD 396-13-3-4 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.66 5.388 0.384 4.144 0.273 396-13-6-4 SFO/Sn B—Si 0.482 8.624 4.576 2.426 2.887 396-13-9-4 SFO/Sn Zr—Si 0.102 11.859 4.468 9.688 4.089

XRD Patterns of ACAR Glass

FIG. 26 shows XRD patterns of ACAR glass made using different hybrid alkoxides. There are no crystalline structures in the XRD patterns. The amorphous structure of the ACAR thin films can be attributed to the small amount of metal alkoxide and fast cooling rate of thin film after heating.

Water Contact Angle

Water contact angles of ACAR glass made using different hybrid alkoxides are listed in Table 19. There is almost the same water contact angle, namely around 5.5 degrees, with ACAR glass made using different hybrid alkoxides. A small amount of metal alkoxide in the ACAR thin film did not significantly change surface property.

TABLE 19 Water contact angle of ACAR glass Glass/ Wt. ratio of coated metal oxide to Contact ID side Sol SiO₂ angle, Ave. STD 396-13-3-4 SFO/Sn Al—Si 0.66 5.35 1.70 396-13-6-4 SFO/Sn B—Si 0.48 5.49 0.30 396-13-9-4 SFO/Sn Zr—Si 1.02 5.98 1.20

As will be appreciated from the above, anti-corrosion and anti-reflection (ACAR) glass may be developed from sols made using hybrid alkoxides. The hybrid alkoxides may include Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄, where R is CH₂CH₃ group, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide, respectively. Two kinds of sols are used to make AR glass; one is from blended sol with hybrid alkoxides, and another is from mixed sol with hybrid alkoxides. As shown above, higher transmittance and durable ACAR glass can be achieved by using a blended sol. ACAR glass made using blended sol shows Tqe % gains as high as 3.2%, and the data is almost same as those made from the Gen 1.5 sol. The reflection of ACAR glass made using the blended sol is almost half of raw SFO glass. The durability of ACAR glass is evaluated using a salt fog chamber test. ACAR glasses made using hybrid alkoxide from Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃ present the best results and pass at least 61 days of testing. Failures of salt fog tests are observed for ACAR glass made using higher amount of B(OBu)₃ (>0.5 wt. %) and lower amount of Zr(OBu)₄ (<0.5 wt. %) in the sol. The durability increase of ACAR glass can be attributed to the structure rearrangement of Al⁺³ or B⁺³ ions from octahedral and tetrahedral configuration, by which the broken bonds produced by non oxygen bond can be repaired, and the strength of glass network be enhanced. Advantages of ACAR glass made using hybrid alkoxides from Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄ can be attributed to to higher bond dissociation energy of Zr—O. Other chemical tests, including water boil, NaOH solution (0.1N), damp heat chamber, and CASS tests, further confirm excellent durability of developed ACAR glass. ACAR thin films passed crockmeter and tape pull test, which indicate that the mechanical strength of the ACAR thin films is accepted. The water contact angle of ACAR glasses is almost the same as that of AR glass made using the Gen 1.5 sol, which shows that minor amounts of metal alkoxide may have little to no effect on surface properties of the ACAR glass. The surface morphology of ACAR glasses shows a trend of roughness decreases with the following order of alkoxides: Zr(OBu)₄>B(OBu)₃>Al(s-OBu)₃. The amorphous structure of the ACAR thin film is found by XRD measurement. The optical thickness and refractive index of ACAR glass was related with the composition and, more particularly, with the metal alkoxide used in the ACAR thin film. More dense structures might be expected in ACAR glass made by higher amount of hybrid alkoxides from Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃.

In certain example embodiments, a method of making a coated article comprising an anti-reflection coating supported by a glass substrate is provided. At least a portion of a solution comprising at least one hybrid alkoxide selected from the group consisting of Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide, respectively, is deposited, directly or indirectly, on the glass substrate. The deposited solution is cured and/or allowed to cure, in making the anti-reflection coating.

In addition to the features of the previous paragraph, in certain example embodiments, the solution may comprise Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and s-OBu is sec-butoxide; Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and OBu is n-butoxide; Si(OR)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group; and/or Zr(OBu)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and OBu is n-butoxide.

In addition to the features of either of the two previous paragraphs, in certain example embodiments, the solution may comprise a silicon nanoparticle and siloxanes, and/or tetraethyl orthosilicates.

In addition to the features of the previous paragraph, in certain example embodiments, the solution may comprise a weight ratio of Al₂O₃ to SiO₂ of 0.01 to 1.0; silica inclusive alkoxides and aluminum inclusive alkoxides; a weight ratio of B₂O₃ to SiO₂ of 0.01 to 1.0 (more preferably a weight ratio of B₂O₃ to SiO₂ of less than 0.5); and/or a weight ratio of ZrO₂ to SiO₂ of 0.01 to 1.5 (more preferably a weight ratio of ZrO₂ to SiO₂ of greater than 1.0).

In addition to the features of any of the four previous paragraphs, in certain example embodiments, the anti-reflection coating may have a refractive index less than 1.5.

In certain example embodiments, there is provided a coated article comprising an anti-reflection coating supported by a glass substrate. The anti-reflection coating comprises a reaction product of a hydrolysis and/or a condensation reaction of at least one hybrid alkoxide selected from the group consisting of Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide. The anti-reflection coating has a refractive index less than 1.5.

In addition to the features of the previous paragraph, in certain example embodiments, the at least one hybrid alkoxide comprises Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and s-OBu is sec-butoxide; the at least one hybrid alkoxide comprises comprises Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and OBu is n-butoxide; the at least one hybrid alkoxide comprises Si(OR)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group; and/or the at least one hybrid alkoxide comprises Zr(OBu)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and OBu is n-butoxide.

In addition to the features of either of the two previous paragraphs, in certain example embodiments, the anti-reflection coating may provide a Tqe % gain of about 3.2%.

While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. 

1-14. (canceled)
 15. A coated article comprising an anti-reflection coating supported by a glass substrate, the anti-reflection coating comprising: a reaction product of a hydrolysis and/or a condensation reaction of at least one hybrid alkoxide selected from the group consisting of Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃ and Si(OR)₄ and Zr(OBu)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group, s-OBu is sec-butoxide and OBu is n-butoxide; wherein the anti-reflection coating has a refractive index less than 1.5.
 16. The coated article according to claim 15, wherein the at least one hybrid alkoxide comprises Si(OR)₄—Al(s-OBu)₃, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and s-OBu is sec-butoxide.
 17. The coated article according to claim 15, wherein the at least one hybrid alkoxide comprises comprises Si(OR)₄—B(OBu)₃, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and OBu is n-butoxide.
 18. The coated article according to claim 15, wherein the at least one hybrid alkoxide comprises Si(OR)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group.
 19. The coated article according to claim 15, wherein the at least one hybrid alkoxide comprises Zr(OBu)₄, where R is a CH₂CH₃ group and OBu is n-butoxide.
 20. The coated article according to claim 15, wherein the anti-reflection coating provides a Tqe % gain of about 3.2%. 